Last Wednesday, I had a talk of those that I love with two people on my list of important people, those people who will fill every minute you spend with them. People who argue but bring your vision with clear ideas and defend their early death in word and action.
After a moment of ideological debate, it was the right point, but not that dangerous right hackneyed and manic right, Franco and cheesy waste, the more convinced of their idolatry by unconsciousness and ignorance that have a solid foundation for neoliberal conservative. But, I reiterate that I am not referring to "the facade Martínez."
As well provided one of the debate partners, our real problem is the right of center, the right to a veil low calorie fooling pursues its interests, but of course without deceiving her. The problem is the young pups who know their class, they know without any doubt what his place in the social organization and struggle to defend, which on the other hand, it is crucial as it gives coherence to the class struggle and shows us once again how right he was adopted by Engels.
But ladies and gentlemen, the right not to social benefits rather than to generate a large middle class. And why create a large middle class? Just because workers are the backbone of the entire chiriguito. Are the mainstay of the system. Therefore, workers are needed to buy perfumes, you will see in Marina D'or, that they go every Sunday to the stadium and spend their money on all types of capital goods, generating wealth to be very rich. What is wealth? Wonderful thing when times are good, though there are countries with which to negotiate favorable trade agreements, based on a position of superiority. When there is frequent exchange of capital between the public, when the forces of production produced without problem, there is definitely work. Wealth in this context can be a wonderful thing. All this seems fairly good, until it reaches the earthquake. And if you can make a fundamental conclusion of the 150 years of struggle against capitalism, the pure scientific analysis, is what the crisis is and will be cyclical. And although there who says that every decade since they suffer less progressively achieve social improvements that can mitigate the consequences, too flip question in this society that every day lose more rights, we can not forget that each unemployed worker can not reach ends must be a compelling reason enough to consider whether we are ethical with our positions. It is at this point, which is based all my criticism, the right light numbs the people, is opium for the people. Yesterday, today and tomorrow the right has been faithful defender of the established social order and it goes without saying that in a few cases the history books show a dominance of the popular sectors. The right is a system tool that jealously guards the benefits bourgeois. But let no one misunderstand me, bourgeoisie are the owners of small and medium enterprises at the expense of hard workers who try to offer work to receive just remuneration for capital investment, risk groups, health and years of work in the attempt, often Unfortunately, with disastrous consequences. Booty bourgeoisie are, are the leaders of Wall Street, are the speculators, the entrepreneurs who strangled workers those of the "pitch." These are the twenty-first century bourgeois. But all these individuals, do not budge when it comes to tightening the belt when the press hail. And at that moment, the girl comes into play right. Start the Shock Doctrine, the years of neoliberal economics and pitch forget to blame all the problems of an economy lagged the tepid reform of "reds." They remind us how good we were and how you can get back without problems, simply cut here, paste there and uncoordinated response to the left, is succeeding. But disappointments, are bread today, hunger for tomorrow. The right will never lead the people to their emancipation, cyclical crisis still exists, continue throwing millions of workers to economic misfortune, the hard times. Deserves to enjoy life and discarding the theory of human immortality, every man, every woman in the bed of death should be able to say that was always free or at least fought for no dollar, the euro was worth no more than a life.
"They can cut all the flowers, but not stop the Spring" After a moment of ideological debate, it was the right point, but not that dangerous right hackneyed and manic right, Franco and cheesy waste, the more convinced of their idolatry by unconsciousness and ignorance that have a solid foundation for neoliberal conservative. But, I reiterate that I am not referring to "the facade Martínez."
As well provided one of the debate partners, our real problem is the right of center, the right to a veil low calorie fooling pursues its interests, but of course without deceiving her. The problem is the young pups who know their class, they know without any doubt what his place in the social organization and struggle to defend, which on the other hand, it is crucial as it gives coherence to the class struggle and shows us once again how right he was adopted by Engels.
But ladies and gentlemen, the right not to social benefits rather than to generate a large middle class. And why create a large middle class? Just because workers are the backbone of the entire chiriguito. Are the mainstay of the system. Therefore, workers are needed to buy perfumes, you will see in Marina D'or, that they go every Sunday to the stadium and spend their money on all types of capital goods, generating wealth to be very rich. What is wealth? Wonderful thing when times are good, though there are countries with which to negotiate favorable trade agreements, based on a position of superiority. When there is frequent exchange of capital between the public, when the forces of production produced without problem, there is definitely work. Wealth in this context can be a wonderful thing. All this seems fairly good, until it reaches the earthquake. And if you can make a fundamental conclusion of the 150 years of struggle against capitalism, the pure scientific analysis, is what the crisis is and will be cyclical. And although there who says that every decade since they suffer less progressively achieve social improvements that can mitigate the consequences, too flip question in this society that every day lose more rights, we can not forget that each unemployed worker can not reach ends must be a compelling reason enough to consider whether we are ethical with our positions. It is at this point, which is based all my criticism, the right light numbs the people, is opium for the people. Yesterday, today and tomorrow the right has been faithful defender of the established social order and it goes without saying that in a few cases the history books show a dominance of the popular sectors. The right is a system tool that jealously guards the benefits bourgeois. But let no one misunderstand me, bourgeoisie are the owners of small and medium enterprises at the expense of hard workers who try to offer work to receive just remuneration for capital investment, risk groups, health and years of work in the attempt, often Unfortunately, with disastrous consequences. Booty bourgeoisie are, are the leaders of Wall Street, are the speculators, the entrepreneurs who strangled workers those of the "pitch." These are the twenty-first century bourgeois. But all these individuals, do not budge when it comes to tightening the belt when the press hail. And at that moment, the girl comes into play right. Start the Shock Doctrine, the years of neoliberal economics and pitch forget to blame all the problems of an economy lagged the tepid reform of "reds." They remind us how good we were and how you can get back without problems, simply cut here, paste there and uncoordinated response to the left, is succeeding. But disappointments, are bread today, hunger for tomorrow. The right will never lead the people to their emancipation, cyclical crisis still exists, continue throwing millions of workers to economic misfortune, the hard times. Deserves to enjoy life and discarding the theory of human immortality, every man, every woman in the bed of death should be able to say that was always free or at least fought for no dollar, the euro was worth no more than a life.
Pablo Neruda
Ordóñez Pablo Iglesias
IS-PSOE Coordinator Extremadura
0 comments:
Post a Comment