Rereading the texts of the subject United States History II, namely an interview with the famous Marxist historian Herbert Aptheker, comes to mind recurrent claim that because of that history is written by winners. In this brief reflection, I would go one step further, it is not only the analysis and historiography, is this can be handled without any problem on our part and the worst atrocity would receive poor education our readers and do not want much less take 
care about something as crucial as this. Historiography should be as objective as our own human condition allows us. However, this is relegated to the bottom of my priorities in comparison to the atrocities that have led to the ruling classes during the late nineteenth century and along the S.XX. Why? Try to put the entevista hilándolo quoting at the beginning of writing. Aptheker, in his "Black American Slave Revolts " argued that African slaves had never wanted to be enslaved and that the concept of openness that has hung over them was false. Is it that strange? Since man is a man loved freedom above all things, this law has faced the man on battlefields around the world, much blood has been shed by the refusal of some to the good of many. However, it is curious to recognize this reality now seems simple, it has not been understood well during the long journey of many peoples, even today it seems that some do not want to accept that man and freedom are indivisible sum. The question therefore is: Who has influenced society so that it becomes clearer in the most absolute of obscurantism? From my point of view, recourse to an analysis of class struggle, I have no intention or knowledge sufficient to develop here. Still trying to conceive and this reality will try to develop this issue, I refer to this nineteenth-century Brazil. In the midst of political turmoil, with Republicans and a number of social forces, trying to end the imperial structure, a government minister, was to suggest that Brazil could never become a country of the size of the United States, simply because fact that they had the benefits they bring a majority white population. Would then be content with being a great country of second row. This atrocity worthy of the years of the Third Reich clearly responds to a phenomenon of alienation, imposed from on high, imposed from the ruling class. Brazil is not understandable without the indigenous population and African, who raised the structural supports for sugar mills, the main economic engine of this country for two centuries. As you can ABServer, it is not manipulated history, but a present. These are the little jibes that history leaves us for analysis, sadly, all too often.
care about something as crucial as this. Historiography should be as objective as our own human condition allows us. However, this is relegated to the bottom of my priorities in comparison to the atrocities that have led to the ruling classes during the late nineteenth century and along the S.XX. Why? Try to put the entevista hilándolo quoting at the beginning of writing. Aptheker, in his "Black American Slave Revolts " argued that African slaves had never wanted to be enslaved and that the concept of openness that has hung over them was false. Is it that strange? Since man is a man loved freedom above all things, this law has faced the man on battlefields around the world, much blood has been shed by the refusal of some to the good of many. However, it is curious to recognize this reality now seems simple, it has not been understood well during the long journey of many peoples, even today it seems that some do not want to accept that man and freedom are indivisible sum. The question therefore is: Who has influenced society so that it becomes clearer in the most absolute of obscurantism? From my point of view, recourse to an analysis of class struggle, I have no intention or knowledge sufficient to develop here. Still trying to conceive and this reality will try to develop this issue, I refer to this nineteenth-century Brazil. In the midst of political turmoil, with Republicans and a number of social forces, trying to end the imperial structure, a government minister, was to suggest that Brazil could never become a country of the size of the United States, simply because fact that they had the benefits they bring a majority white population. Would then be content with being a great country of second row. This atrocity worthy of the years of the Third Reich clearly responds to a phenomenon of alienation, imposed from on high, imposed from the ruling class. Brazil is not understandable without the indigenous population and African, who raised the structural supports for sugar mills, the main economic engine of this country for two centuries. As you can ABServer, it is not manipulated history, but a present. These are the little jibes that history leaves us for analysis, sadly, all too often. Finally, in the words of Herbert Aptheker, " I do not understand how a human being with some understanding of history, past and their struggles, can be aligned to the right. They do, we already know, and really do not understand. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment