A political scientists usually fills their mouths with the word democracy. It is my intention to retrace the steps given above criticism of these market democracies in which the human being is free to eat at McDonald's or in a Turkish restaurant to buy a car or another, to read a newspaper liar or one that perhaps more. That is not the intention, after all, with which it is falling I think everyone already understands that these democracies, like the English with 43% of youth unemployment and 36% of waste contracts, rather than democracies seem a Valle-Inclan's work. No, the idea of \u200b\u200bthese words is to highlight the hypocrisy of Democrats who appreciates games and scales of values \u200b\u200bhighlighted by the distance that does not suffer in his flesh the evil that surrounds much of humanity. They talk about Cuba, and often deny or skip the two categories of authoritarianism, the redistributive redistritubutivo and not even some people put them in a sack scum like Pinochet and Castro commander. They are usually those who mint democracy based on the realities of Europe and lies of the middle class which is considered outdated in that state of grace despite the precarious labor, despite the precariousness of salary, housing and future, which seems jet black with the labor reforms that violate the weak, be common to all of our history. They speak of democracy understood as electoral freedoms, but deny the Cuban electoral system into categories of thought relying exclusively focused Liberals in our models, vote every 4 years to lists imposed by political parties often undemocratic in itself. They talk of respect for the media, not to mention the havoc that they generate among poorly educated people speak of freedom when people are dying of hunger and violence breaks out everywhere gathered in elite corruption as seen in countries like El Salvador or Guatemala, which of course are "flawed democracies" without forgetting that perfect democracy is similar to socialism, still has not been achieved anywhere. Western thoughts speak only trying to apply models that are certainly desirable, but where institutions absurd and agencies that support it are lacking. They talk about human rights as those who do not remember being violated every day in Europe, in Spain denying decent jobs, people squeezing through reforms to forget that investment companies listed on our country by 1%. Speak and show their selfishness, from academicians views that seem to have forgotten that it is institutions that will shape a state or nation, but citizens and these must be tailored to your needs. But of course, from the office, surrounded by books that few read, locked in the inner circle which is becoming the academic world seems to have forgotten their commitment to society and of course with the monthly salary arriving every month, life is seen differently. Says a friend there who is an advocate of remote causes, "I do not like blacks or Gypsies, I prefer that women earn half and pay low taxes", but sponsored a child in the Congo, I say that there are political scientists Those who like their own remote causes, in Cuba, blockaded by Yankee hypocrisy are "undemocratic and lock you communist, but agreed with the Saudis, an example of savoir faire or I sell half of my debt to China," currently are not killed in the streets and more or less (I'll talk about the embargo, which some still think it's a lesser evil) the population enjoys of what humanity can be granted to the one above, children are starving and there is security for all. Most gentlemen, I prefer to call me Castro, a Salvadoran or Guatemalan Democrat. The hypocrisy of power. Although of course comparing Cuba with Haiti, who would want to live in Cuba? Paradise is far from Cuba, but no closer to any other Central American country.
